Quantum-Enhanced Microbial Biotechnology for Smart Food Systems: Redefining Nutrition with Self-Regulating Foods
Keywords:
Quantum Biotechnology, Smart Foods, Quantum Biosensors, Engineered Microbiomes, Food Security, Climate Resilience, Precision FermentationAbstract
Global food systems confront major challenges: approximately 733 million people face chronic hunger, around 1.3 billion tons of food are lost or wasted each year, and agriculture accounts for roughly 12–20% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. This editorial explores the conceptual and emerging potential of integrating quantum dot (QD)-based biosensors with CRISPR-engineered microbiomes to advance more adaptive, sustainable food production and safety monitoring. Recent developments highlight: sensitive detection of foodborne pathogens and contaminants (typically in the 10¹–10³ CFU/mL range for bacteria and sub-nanomolar to femtomolar levels for certain chemicals in optimized platforms); improved probiotic stability and reduced production costs through bio-based nanocomposites and multilayer encapsulation; promising biodegradability and low bioaccumulation profiles for biomass-derived carbon QDs; and enhanced nutrient yields in solar-powered microbial bioreactors compared to some conventional methods. Although fully integrated closed-loop self-regulating systems remain largely conceptual and in early exploration stages, such synergies could meaningfully support United Nations Sustainable Development Goals related to zero hunger, responsible consumption, and climate action. A proposed long-term roadmap emphasizes phased development, open-source approaches, and collaborative efforts to assess feasibility, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
Downloads
References
1. Sheehy EJ, et al. Biomaterial-based endochondral bone regeneration: a shift from traditional-based endochondral tissue engineering paradigms to developmentally inspired strategies. Mater Today Bio. 2019;3:100017.
2. Battaffarano G, et al. Strategies for bone regeneration: from graft to tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(1):174.
3. Kargozint S, et al. Bone tissue engineering using human cells: current prospects and trends. Appl Sci. 2019;9(1):174.
4. Ferrari M, et al. Cell encapsulation: Overcoming barriers in cell transplantation in diabetes and beyond. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;139:92-115.
5. Quek J, et al. Role of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(12):174.
6. Nemati S, et al. Alginategelatin encapsulation of human endothelial cells promoted angiogenesis in in vivo and in vitro milieu. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(12):2920-30.
7. Huang S, et al. Systematic administration of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells does not halt progression of diabetic nephropathy. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:120607.
8. Silaban BJS, et al. Optimisation of medium composition and fermentation conditions to maximise viable cells and biomass production of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DLBSK207. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2025;12(1):e3.
9. Yaghoubzadeh Z, et al. Cytotoxicity activity of peptides derived from enzymatic hydrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris proteins. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2025;12(1):e1.
10. Fitzpatrick A, et al. Self-consistent field approach for the variational quantum eigensolver: orbital optimisation goes adaptive. J Chem Phys. 2024;160(14):144101.
11. Shukri M, et al. Comparison of two laccase enzymes from Trametes versicolor and Trametes pubescens for the assessment of phenolic acids content using a laccase-based biosensor. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2025;12(1):e5.
12. Whitehead J, et al. Hydrogel mechanics are a key driver of bone formation by mesenchymal stromal cell spheroids. Biomaterials. 2021;269:120607.
13. Wang J, et al. A novel core-shell microcapsule for encapsulation and 3D culture of embryonic stem cells. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1(9):1002-9.
14. Ribeiro C, et al. Preparation of well-dispersed chitosan/alginate hollow multilayered microcapsules for enhanced cellular internalization. Molecules. 2018;23(3):625.
15. Correia CR, et al. Liquified chitosan-alginate multilayer capsules incorporating poly(L-lactic acid) microparticles as cell carriers. Soft Matter. 2021;17(25):1-10.
16. Kapusetti G, et al. Natural biopolymers for bone tissue engineering: A brief review. Eng Regen. 2022;4(2):193-204.
17. Puscacelu RG, et al. Alginate: From food industry to biomedical applications and management of metabolic disorders. Polymers. 2020;12(10):1-30.
18. Hernández-González AC, et al. Alginate hydrogels for bioprinting: A review. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;229:115551.
19. Kim SK, et al. Microencapsulation system for scalable differentiation of peripheral motor neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biomater Sci. 2025;13:4717-29.
20. Gwon K, et al. Chitosan-alginate-AMP hydrogel for bone regeneration. Biomater Sci. 2025;13:1-15.
21. Priyadharshini D, et al. Precision to plate: AI-driven innovations in fermentation and hyper-personalized diets. Front Nutr. 2025;12:1659511.
22. Ramírez A, et al. Exploring the future of probiotics with innovations in delivery systems and market insights. Food Biosci. 2025;71:107029.
23. Arshad U, et al. Biobased carbon quantum dots: An emerging nano-enabled paradigm for pesticide removal and sustainable plant protection. Sci Total Environ. 2025;934:173456.
24. Sen B, et al. Carbon quantum dots as multifunctional nanomaterials for sustainable optoelectronic biosensing and green photonics. Commun Mater. 2026;7:1056.
25. Dhiman S, et al. Nutritional enhancement of plant-based fermented foods: Microbial innovations for a sustainable future. Fermentation. 2025;11(6):346.
26. Zoghi A, et al. Bio-detoxification of mycotoxin-contaminated feedstuffs: Using lactic acid bacteria and yeast. Appl Environ Biotechnol. 2024;9(1):62-75.
27. Raven JA, Beardall J. Carbon acquisition mechanisms of algae: carbon dioxide diffusion and carbon dioxide concentrating mechanisms. Photosynth Res. 2022;152(2-3):97-112.
28. Khorshidian N, et al. Valorisation of date waste using microbial fermentations. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2024;14(21):26597-610.
29. Bodkhe GA, et al. Biosensors in microbial ecology: revolutionising food safety and quality. Microorganisms. 2025;13(2):123456.
30. Tsai CC, Lai ZY. Rapid identification and application of Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus pentosus using multiplex polymerase chain reaction and species-specific primers, targeting 16S ribosomal RNA and recA genes. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e24.
31. Werdiningsih W, et al. Addition of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. Plantarum WGK4 to pressure-cooked Komak (Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet) to decrease soaking time and water requirement during acid fermentation in tempe processing. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e23.
32. Gradisteanu Pircalabioru G, et al. Fast detection of bacterial gut pathogens on miniaturised devices: an overview. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024;21(5):456-78.
33. Virk V, et al. Amelioration in nanobiosensors for the control of plant diseases: current status and future challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:987654.
34. Yulinery T, et al. Black grass jelly encapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum Mar8 in honey and D-allulose beverage enriched with mangosteen pericarp extract. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e8.
35. Khorshidian N, et al. Valorisation of date waste using microbial fermentations. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2024;14(21):26597-610.
36. Nasresfahani M, et al. Development of a cost-effective culture medium for the bacterial cellulose production using food industry wastes. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e11.
37. Kruchinin A, et al. Effects of critical storage temperatures on microbiological, physico-chemical and sensory indicators of sweetened condensed milk. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e12.
38. Mukherjee J, et al. Assessment of the physicochemical, antioxidant, in-vitro anti-diabetic and nutritional characteristics of pigeon pea protein hydrolysates. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e19.
39. Sağlam H. Incorporation of microencapsulated and free Lactiplantibacillus plantarum to bitter chocolate: Sensory and survival analyses. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e18.
40. Angelova S, et al. Effects of organic solvents on acceptor reactions for oligosaccharide synthesis catalysed by glucansucrase URE 13-300. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e9.
41. Hokmi A, et al. Leptospirosis in slaughterhouse personnel: A seroepidemiologic study using the microscopic agglutination test. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e5.
42. Zhang L, et al. CRISPR-based gene editing for enhanced microbial robustness in food fermentation. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(3):456-67.
43. Gupta R, et al. Nanosensor-integrated smart packaging for real-time food spoilage monitoring. Food Chem. 2025;435:134567.
44. Li Q, et al. Quantum-enhanced imaging for microbial contaminant detection in food matrices. ACS Nano. 2024;18(5):3456-78.
45. Wang Z, et al. Synthetic biology approaches for optimising microbial consortia in fermented food production. J Food Sci Technol. 2025;62(2):234-56.
46. Maheshwari S, et al. Biodegradable polysaccharide-based carbon quantum dots for cancer diagnosis and therapy: progress and prospects. Biomed Mater Devices. 2025;3(1):123-45.
47. WHO. World health statistics 2021: monitoring health for the SDGs. Geneva: WHO; 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240027053
48. Chi Y, et al. Food nanozymology: nanozyme engineering toward future food. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(1):234567.
49. Senthil GA, et al. Quantum AI: a cognitive machine learning technique based on nurturing food security, sustainability, and predictive analysis for life science-bioengineering. BIO Web Conf. 2025;45:67890.
50. Rajabi M, et al. Design and synthesis of a new anticancer and antimicrobial nanocomposite by microalgae based on an up-down approach. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e15.
51. Mendoza-Espinoza JA, et al. Effects of pasteurisation on antihyperglycemic and chemical parameters of Xoconostle (Stenocereus stellatus) juice. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2024;11(1):e4.
52. Gafoor RA, et al. Revolutionising food safety and crop production: harnessing novel biosensors. Food Biotechnol. 2024;38(3):345-67.
53. Shukri M, et al. Comparison of two laccase enzymes from Trametes versicolor and Trametes pubescens for the assessment of phenolic acids content using a laccase-based biosensor. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2025;12(1):e5.
54. Fitzpatrick A, et al. Self-consistent field approach for the variational quantum eigensolver: orbital optimisation goes adaptive. J Chem Phys. 2024;160(14):144101.
55. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment (CAC/GL 44-2003). Rome: FAO/WHO; 2003. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/standards/list-standards/en/
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Negin Rezaei Savadkouhi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.