The Role of Organic Biofertilisers Containing Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in the Efficiency of Agricultural Products

Authors

    Maryam Taheri Department of Microbiology, Fal.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
    Zarrindokht Emami-Karvani Department of Microbiology, Fal.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
    Seyed Hossein Mirdamadian Department of Microbiology, Fal.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
    Alaleh Zoghi * Department of Food Science and Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition Science and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran alalehzoghi@gmail.com
https://doi.org/10.66224/BiotechIntellect.3.1.48

Keywords:

Diazotrophic bacteria, Soil fertility , Crop, Azotobacter , Azospirillum, Rhizobium

Abstract

Today, due to the environmental and health pollution caused by the use of chemical fertilizers, the production and use of biofertilizers is considered the most important approach in the field of soil biology and has attracted the attention of investors in the agricultural sector worldwide. Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plants; however, plants are unable to directly use atmospheric molecular nitrogen (N2). Diazotrophs are bacteria that convert N2 into a form more usable by plants, such as ammonia. The special importance of the activity of these bacteria in fixing and providing nitrogen has led researchers to use these bacteria as an alternative source of nitrogen required for plant growth. The purpose of this review is to summarize the nitrogen-fixing bacteria role in the efficiency of agricultural products. After a glance at the definition of fertilizers, biofertilizers are described, as they are the most important group of fertilizers. After that, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, including Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Rhizobium, and Acetobacter, are explained in detail. Finally, the effect of biofertilizers enriched with nitrogen-fixing bacteria on agricultural products is described. It is worth mentioning that this review article can be applied in different agricultural fields to maintain soil fertility and enhance crop productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Zarrindokht Emami-Karvani, Department of Microbiology, Fal.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

    Zarrindokht Emami-KarvaniDepartment of Microbiology, Fal. C.,Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

  • Seyed Hossein Mirdamadian, Department of Microbiology, Fal.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

    mirdamadian@iau.ac.ir

References

1. Zhang J, Cook J, Nearing JT, Zhang J, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Langille MGI, Cheng Z. Harnessing the plant microbiome to promote the growth of agricultural crops. Microbiol Res. 2021; 245: 126690.

2. Xu J, Li Y, Li L. A comprehensive review of the effects of organic amendments on soil health and fertility: Mechanisms, greenhouse gas emissions, and implications for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy. 2025; 15(12): 2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122705

3. Jote C. The impacts of using inorganic chemical fertilizers on the environment and human health. Organic Med Chem Int J. 2023; 13: 008. https://doi.org/10.19080/OMCIJ.2023.13.555864

4. Chaudhary P, Singh S, Chaudhary A, Sharma A, Kumar G. Overview of biofertilizers in crop production and stress management for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 930340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.930340

5. Daniel AI, Fadaka AO, Gokul A, Bakare OO, Aina O, Fisher S, et al. Biofertilizer: the future of food security and food safety. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6): 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061220

6. Santos F, Melkani S, Oliveira-Paiva C, Bini D, Pavuluri K, Gatiboni L, et al. Biofertilizer use in the United States: definition, regulation, and pros-pects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 108(1): 511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13347-4

7. Aguilar-Paredes A, Valdés G, Araneda N, Val-debenito E, Hansen F, Nuti M. Microbial community in the composting process and its positive impact on the soil biota in sustainable agriculture. Agronomy, 2023; 13(2): 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020542

8. Zhao X, Li J, Che Z, Xue L. Succession of the bacterial communities and functional characteristics in sheep manure composting. Biology. 2022; 11(8): 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081181

9. Mahmoudi M, Asbai Z, Foughal T, Mabicka Obame RG, Ognalaga M, Malounghou Bounangnan JD, et al. Biofertilizers for sustainable and environ-ment-friendly agriculture. Nat Built Social Environ Health. 2025; 1(5): 49–83. https://doi.org/10.63095/NBSEH.25.934721

10. Aasfar A, Bargaz A, Yaakoubi K, Hilali A, Bennis I, Zeroual Y, Meftah Kadmiri I. Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 628379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379

11. Ma X, Wang L, Xue Z, Wang Q, Qian Y, Yan A, Cai L. The combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer increases alfalfa yield, enhances soil nutrient availability, and impr-oves soil biological properties. Agronomy. 2026; 16(8): 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16080795

12. Kumar S, Diksha, Sindhu SS, Kumar R. Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022; 3: 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094

13. Lopez-Arredondo EJ, Rodríguez-Zaragoza S, Cabirol N, Perales-Vela HV, Ledesma-Medina KY. Nitrogen-fixing bacterial inoculation: a meta-analysis of its effects on crop productivity and methodological considerations. Cogent Food Agric. 2025; 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2448326

14. Sulaiman KH, Al-Barakah FN, Assaeedi AM, Muhammad Dari BA. Isolation and identification of Azospirillum and Azotobacter species from Acacia spp. at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Bangladesh J Bot. 2019; 48(2): 239-251. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v48i2.47546

15. Alom K, Akbar D, Xu CY, Dong TH. Assessing environment impacts of chemical fertilizers consum-ption in Australia: State-level evidence. Environ Sustain Indicators. 2025; 28: 101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.101053.

16. Ahmed T, Noman M, Qi Y, Shahid M, Hussain S, Masood HA, et al. Fertilization of microbial composts: A technology for improving stress resilience in plants. Plants. 2023; 12(20): 3550. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203550

17. Shahzad M, Hayat R, Mujtaba G, Rehman WU, Nadeem M. Biofertilizers in sustainable agriculture: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects. Discov Agric. 2025; 3: 224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00318-0

18. Carro L, Nouioui I. Taxonomy and systematics of plant probiotic bacteria in the genomic era. AIMS Microbiol. 2017; 3(3): 383-412. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.383

19. Mgolozeli S, Nciizah AD, Wakindiki IIC, Mudau FN. Nitrogen mineralization of selected organic materials and their combined effects with nitrogen fertilizer on spinach yield. Plants. 2024; 13 (14): 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141974

20. Yang H, Li Y, Cao Y, Shi W, Xie E, Mu N, et al. Nitrogen nutrition contributes to plant fertility by affecting meiosis initiation. Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28173-3

21. Kristy B, Davidson J, Evans SE, Tiemann LK. Reduced soil diazotroph diversity decreases nitrogen fixation rates, but depends on land management. Appl Soil Ecol. 2025; 211: 106152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106152.

22. Chen SL, Tsai MK, Huang YM, Huang CH. Diversity and characterization of Azotobacter isolates obtained from rice rhizosphere soils in Taiwan. Ann Microbiol. 2018; 68: 17–26.

23. Sumbul A, Ansari RA, Rizvi R, Mahmood I. Azotobacter: A potential bio-fertilizer for soil and plant health management. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020; 27 (12): 3634-3640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.004

24. Haris M, Hussain T, Tauseef A, Khan A, Khan AA. Application of microbial inoculants as an alter-native to chemical products for decomposition of org-anic wastes. In: Developments in Applied Micro-biology and Biotechnology, Microbial Inoculants. Editor(s): Sharma VK, Kumar A, Zambrano Passarini MR, Parmar S, Singh VK. Academic Press. 2023; pp. 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99043-1.00006-2

25. Wani SA, Chand S, Wani MA, Ramzan M, Hakeem KR. Azotobacter chroococcum – A potential biofertilizer in agriculture: An overview. In: Soil Science: Agricultural and Environmental Pros-pectives. Editor(s): Hakeem K, Akhtar J, Sabir M. Springer. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34451-5_15

26. Kosem N, Ohsaki Y, Watanabe M, Inada M, Song JT, Ishihara T. Exploring Azotobacter: A nitro-gen-fixing microorganism as a powerhouse for sustainable and green ammonia synthesis. J Appl Microbiol. 2026; 137(4); lxag083. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxag083

27. Figiel S, Rusek P, Ryszko U, Brodowska MS. Microbially enhanced biofertilizers: Technologies, mechanisms of action, and agricultural applications. Agronomy. 2025; 15(5): 1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051191

28. Suryatmana P, Handayani S, Bang S, Hind-ersah R. Screening and profiling of mercury-resistant Azotobacter isolated from gold mine tailing in Pongkor, West Java. J Degrad Mining Lands Manag. 2024; 11(2): 5287-5300. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2024.112.5287

29. Raffi MM, Charyulu PB. Azospirillum-bio-fertilizer for sustainable cereal crop production: Current status. In: Recent Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biochemistry. Editor(s): Viswanath B. Academic Press. 2021; Pp. 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821406-0.00018-7

30. Fukami J, Cerezini P, Hungria M. Azo-spirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation. AMB Express. 2018; 8: 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0608-1

31. Yasuda M, Dastogeer KMG, Sarkodee-Addo E, Tokiwa C, Isawa T, Shinozaki S, et al. Impact of Azospirillum sp. B510 on the rhizosphere microbiome of rice under field conditions. Agronomy. 2022; 12: 1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061367

32. Amat D, Thakur JK, Mandal A, Sahu A, Reddy KKK. Production and utilization of legume inoculants (Rhizobium) in India. Harit Dhara. 2020; 3(2): 28–31.

33. Maitra S, Praharaj S, Brestic M, Sahoo RK, Sagar L, Shankar T, et al. Rhizobium as biotechnological tools for green solutions: An environment-friendly approach for sustainable crop production in the modern era of climate change. Curr Microbiol. 2023; 80(7): 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03317-w

34. Pereira de Moraes Carvalho C, Oliveira AF, Rouws LFM, dos Santos Dourado F, Reed Rodrigues Coelho M, Alves BJR, Zilli JÉ. Genetic Diversity and Nodulation Potential of Bradyrhizobium Strains in Cowpea and Soybean. Plants. 2025; 14(24): 3857. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243857

35. Goyal RK, Mattoo AK, Schmidt MA. Rhizo-bial host interactions and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legume crops toward agriculture sustainability. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 669404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.669404.

36. Duan HX, Luo CL, Wang X, Batool A, et al. Responses of legumes to rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under abiotic stresses: A global meta-analysis. Agronomy. 2024; 14(11): 2597. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112564

37. da Silva FB, Barbosa JZ, Tiecher T, Borin JBM, Treichel B, de Sá ELS. Species-dependent effect of rhizobacteria co-inoculation in legume plants: A global meta-analysis. Rhizosphere. 2024; 30: 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100869

38. Bahuguna V, Matura R, Farswan AS, Naqvi SS, Sharma N, Chaudhary M. Rhizobium as a potential biofertilizer and its quality control analysis for sustainable agriculture. J Appl Biol Biotech. 2025; 13(3): 97-105. http://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2025.197428

39. Thirumal G, Reddy RS, Triveni S, Damo-darachari K, Bhavya K. Evaluate the shelf life of Rhizobium carrier based biofertilizer stored at different temperatures at different intervals. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017; 6(7): 753-759. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.094

40. Oliveira ALM, Santos OJAP, Marcelino PRF, Milani KML, Zuluaga MYA, Zucareli C, Gonçalves LSA. Maize inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense Ab-V5 cells enriched with exopolysaccharides and polyhydroxybutyrate results in high productivity under low N fertilizer input. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8: 1873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01873

41. Mnalku A, Demise N, Muleta D, Abera Y, Mitiku G. Manual for rhizobial inoculant develop-pment and management. Ethiopian Inst Agric Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28906.67521

42. Reis VM, Teixeira KR. Nitrogen fixing bact-eria in the family Acetobacteraceae and their role in agriculture. J Basic Microbiol. 2015; 55(8): 931-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201400898

43. Ouattara YA, Soro D, Fossou KR, Yebouet ACI, Cissé IA, Akissi DM, et al. Isolation and characterization of indigenous Acetobacter strains from cashew apple and their potential use in vinegar production. Fermentation. 2025; 11(1): 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11010038

44. Dutta D, Gachhui R. Novel nitrogen-fixing Acetobacter nitrogenifigens sp. nov., isolated from Kombucha tea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56: 1899–1903.

45. Suman A, Singh P, Lal M. Effects of diverse habitat biofertilizers on yield and nitrogen balance in plant-ratoon crop cycle of sugarcane in Subtropics. Sugar Tech. 2013; 15: 36–43.

46. De la Cruz CPP, Bird CO, Isulat MD. Sprou-ting, survival and growth of young sugarcane (Sacch-arum officinarum L.) treated with diazotrophic bacteria (Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus). Philipp Agric Sci. 2012; 95: 106–111.

47. Mondal M, Skalicky M, Garai S, Hossain A, Sarkar S, et al. Supplementing nitrogen in combin-ation with Rhizobium inoculation and soil mulch in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production system: Part II. Effect on phenology, growth, yield attributes, pod quality, profitability and nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101513

48. Fang L, Ju W, Yang C, Jin X, Zhang C. Exogenous application of signaling molecules to enhance the resistance of legume rhizobium symbiosis in Pb/Cd-contaminated soils. Environ Pollut. 2020; 365: 114744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114744

49. Mfilinge A, Mtei K, Ndakidemi P. Effect of Rhizobium inoculation and supplementation with phosphorus and potassium on growth and total leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content of bush bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. Agricul Sci. 2014; 5: 1413–1419. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.514152

50. Bourion V, Heulin-Gotty K, Aubert V, Tisseyre P, Chabert-Martinello M, Pervent M, et al. Coinoculation of pea core-collection with diverse rhizobial strains shows competitiveness for nodu-lation and efficiency of nitrogen fixation are distinct traits in interaction. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 2249–2263. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.514152

51. Han Q, Ma Q, Chen Y, Tian B, Xu L, Bai Y, et al. Variation in rhizosphere microbial communities and its association with the symbiotic efficiency of rhizobia in soybean. ISME J. 2020; 14: 1915–1928. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0648-9

52. Singh AK, Deepuraj, Masih H, Kumar Y, Peter JK, Mishra SK, et al. Optimization of production parameters and evaluation of shelf life of Rhizobium biofertilizers. Elixir Bio Tech. 2014; 67: 21787–21795.

53. Abdallah HA, Elsalahi RH, Mohamed SE. Quality attributes of co-inoculants based on rhizobia and phosphate solubilizing bacteria under different storage conditions. J Agric Vet Sci. 2019; 12(10): 1–7.

54. Osman AG, Rugheim AME, Elsoni EM. Effects of biofertilization on nodulation, nitrogen and phosphorous content and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan). Adv Environ Biol. 2011; 5(9): 2742–2749. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.978.981

55. Sangeetha D, Stella D. Survival of plant growth promoting bacterial inoculants in different carrier materials. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2012; 3(1): 170–178.

56. Sangwan VP, Sindhu SS, Dahiya OS, Kharb RPS. Improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield inder field conditions by inoculation of microbial strains. Microbiol J. 2012; 2(3): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.3923/mj.2012.86.95

57. Chaudhary D, Narula N, Sindhu SS, Behl RK. Plant growth stimulation of wheat (Triticum aesti-vum L.) by inoculation of salinity tolerant Azoto-bacter strains. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013; 19: 515–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-013-0178-2

58. Wang H, Li H, Zhang M, Song Y, Huang J, Huang H. Carbon dots enhance the nitrogen fixation activity of Azotobacter chroococcum. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2018; 10: 16308–16314. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b03758

59. Yousefi AA, Barzegar AR. Effect of Azoto-bacter and Pseudomonas bacteria inoculation on wheat yield under field condition. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2014; 7: 616.

60. Jain D, Sharma J, Kaur G, Bhojiya AA, Chauhan S, Sharma V, et al. Phenetic and molecular diversity of nitrogenfixing plant growth-promoting Azotobacter isolated from semiarid regions of India. Hindawi BioMed Res Int. 2021; 2021: 6686283. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6686283

61. Galindo FS, Pagliari PH, Fernandes GC, Rodrigues WL, Boleta EHM, Jalal A, et al. Improving sustainable field-grown wheat production with Azospirillum brasilense under tropical conditions: a potential tool for improving nitrogen management. Front Environ Sci. 2022; 10: 821628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.821628

62. Alen’kina SA, Nikitina VE. Stimulating effect from lectins of associative bacteria of the genus Azospirillum on the germination and morphometric characteristics of spring wheat sprouts in simulated abiotic stress. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2021; 68: 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443721010027

63. Chaudhary SR, Sindhu SS. Growth stim-ulation of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) by coinoculation with rhizosphere bacteria and Rhizobium. Legume Res. 2016; 39(6): 1003–1012. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.8605

64. Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS. Soybean seed coinoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense: A new biotech-nological tool to improve yield and sustainability. Am J Plant Sci. 2015; 6(6): 8–11. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.66087

65. Babu AN, Jogaiah S, Ito SI, Nagaraj AK, Tran LSP. Improvement of growth, fruit weight and early blight disease protection of tomato plants by rhizosphere bacteria is correlated with their beneficial traits and induced biosynthesis of antioxidant peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. Plant Sci. 2015; 231: 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.11.006

66. Kavadia A, Omirou M, Fasoula DA, Louka F, Ehaliotis C, Ioannides IM. Co-inoculations with rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alters mycorrhizal composition and lead to synergistic growth effects in cowpea that are fungal combination-dependent. Appl Soil Ecol. 2021; 167: 104013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104013

67. Arzanesh MH, Alikhani HA, Khavazi K, Rahimian HA, Miransari M. Wheat (Triticum aesti-vum L.) growth enhancement by Azospirillum sp. under drought stress. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 27: 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0444-1

68. Piccinin GG, Dan LG, Braccini ALE, Mariano DC, Okumura RS, Bazo GL, Ricci TT. Agronomic efficiency of Azospirillum brasilense in physiological parameters and yield components in wheat crop. J Agronom. 2011; 10(4): 132–135. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2011.132.135

69. Braccini AL, Dan LGM, Piccinin GG, Albrecht LP, Barbosa MC, Ortiz AHT. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense, associated with the use of bioregulators in maize. Revista Caatinga. 2012; 25(2): 58-64.

70. Su Y, Wang Y, Liu G, Zhang Z, Li X, Chen G, et al. Nitrogen (N) “supplementation, slow release, and retention” strategy improves N use efficiency via the synergistic effect of biochar, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and dicyandiamide. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 908: 168518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168518

71. Nejati Sini H, Barzegar R, Soodaee Mashaee S, Ghasemi Ghahsare M, Mousavi-Fard S, Mozafarian M. Effects of biofertilizer on the production of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in greenhouse. J Agric Food Res. 2024; 16: 101060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101060

72. dos Santos SG, Chaves VA, da Silva Ribeiro F, Alves GC, Reis VM. Rooting and growth of pre-germinated sugarcane seedlings inoculated with diazotrophic bacteria. Appl Soil Ecol. 2019; 133: 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.015

73. Hoseinzade H, Ardakani MR, Shahdi A, Asadi Rahmani H, Noormohammadi G, Miransari M. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) nutrient management using mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic Herbaspirillum seropedicae. J Integrative Agric. 2016; 15(6): 1385–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61241-2

74. dos Santos CLR, Alves GC, de Matos Macedo AV, Giori FG, Pereira W, Urquiaga S, Reis VM. Contribution of a mixed inoculant containing strains of Burkholderia spp. and Herbaspirillum spp. to the growth of three sorghum genotypes under increased nitrogen fertilization levels. Appl Soil Ecol. 2017; 113: 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.02.008

75. Banik A, Dash GK, Swain P, Kumar U, Mukhopadhyay SK, Dangar TK. Application of rice (Oryza sativa L.) root endophytic diazotrophic Azotobacter sp. strain Avi2 (MCC 3432) can increase rice yield under green house and field condition. Microbiol Res. 2019; 219: 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.004

76. Rodrigues MÂ, Ladeira LC, Arrobas M. Azotobacter-enriched organic manures to increase nitrogen fixation and crop productivity. Eur J Agronom. 2018; 93: 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.002

77. Romero-Perdomo F, Abril J, Camelo M, Moreno-Galván A, Pastrana I, Rojas-Tapias D, Bonilla R. Azotobacter chroococcum as a potentially useful bacterial biofertilizer for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum): Effect in reducing N fertilization. Revista Argentina de Microbiol. 2017; 49(4): 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2017.04.006

78. Silva WO, Stamford NP, Silva EVN, Santos CERS, Freitas ADS, Silva MV. The impact of biofer-tilizers with diazotrophic bacteria and fungi chitosan on melon characteristics and nutrient uptake as an alternative for conventional fertilizers. Sci Horticul. 2016; 209: 236–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.027

79. Oliveira NFL, Oliveira WS, Stamford NP, Silva EVN, Santos CERS, Freitas ADS. Effectiveness of biofertilizer enriched in N by Beijerinckia indica on sugarcane grown on an Ultisol and the interactive effects between biofertilizer and sugarcane filter cake. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017; 17(4): 1040–1057. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017000400015

80. Dung TV, Tan DB, Khanh TH, Gale D, Long VV. Effect of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus inoculation and reduced nitrogen fertilizer on yield and growth parameters of rice varieties. J Seed Sci. 2021; 43: e202143029. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1545v43253229

81. Naqqash T, Malik KA, Imran A, Hameed S, Shahid M, Hanif MK, et al. Inoculation with Azospirillum spp. acts as the liming source for improving growth and nitrogen use efficiency of potato. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13: 929114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.929114

82. Zeffa DM, Perini LJ, Silva MB, de Sousa NV, Scapim CA, de Oliveira ALM, et al. Azospirillum brasilense promotes increases in growth and nitrogen use efficiency of maize genotypes. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14(4): e0215332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215332

83. Fadiji A, Xiong C, Egidi E, Singh B. Formulation challenges associated with microbial biofertilizers in sustainable agriculture and paths forward. J Sustain Agric Environ. 2024; 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.70005

Biofertilisers by N2-fixing bacteria for efficient agricultural

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

Submitted

2026-03-01

Revised

2026-03-29

Accepted

2026-04-26

How to Cite

Taheri, M., Emami-Karvani, Z., Mirdamadian, S. H. ., & Zoghi, A. (2026). The Role of Organic Biofertilisers Containing Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in the Efficiency of Agricultural Products. BiotechIntellect, 3(1), e13 (1-19). https://doi.org/10.66224/BiotechIntellect.3.1.48

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.